In this homework, we’ll be working with some of OCaml’s features for abstraction and modularity.
This is the first homework where you’ll be working in multiple files:
OLSet
, an
implementation of the set abstract data type using sorted lists
BSTSet
, an
implementation of the set abstract data type using binary search trees
In addition to these files, we have provided you with
setInterface.ml, which defines the 'a set
abstract data type and the operations which can be performed on it. Although
you should read this file thoroughly, you should not modify it (doing
so might cause your homework not to compile on our submission server, and you
will receive no credit)!
You should do the work in the order specified below—our server will grade in that order, and it will be easier for you to follow along!
Once you are finished, be sure to submit your homework. Codio will take care of packaging the appropriate files into a file called submit-hw03(timestamp).zip. If, for some reason, you create the zip file yourself, be sure that it includes just the six files mentioned above.
Visit the CIS 120 Fall 2017 course in Codio and select the "HW03: Abstraction and Modularity" project.
The goal of this homework is to implement several generic data structures and then use them to perform a basic, real-world task. The homework consists of eight problems, divided into three parts.
You may not use any OCaml library functions in this homework assignment, unless explicitly instructed to.
There is also an FAQ document for this homework. This zip file contains the original source, in case you need to refer to it.
In problem 1, you will get some practice with functions that use generic types. Recall that generic types in OCaml can be used to help abstract out frequently used programming patterns. Problem 2 introduces higher-order functions (which take another function as an argument, and/or produce a new function as a result). You should write as many tests as you deem necessary to ensure the correctness of your functions.
These higher-order functions are provided:
(* `transform` takes another function as an argument (and applies it to every element of a list). *) let rec transform (f: 'a -> 'b) (l: 'a list) : 'b list = begin match l with | [] -> [] | x :: xs -> f x :: transform f xs end
(* `fold` collapses a list into a single result value. *) let rec fold (combine: 'a -> 'b -> 'b) (base: 'b) (l: 'a list) : 'b = begin match l with | [] -> base | x :: xs -> combine x (fold combine base xs) end
(* `filter` uses a predicate function to filter out elements that don't satisfy a condition `pred`. *) let rec filter (pred: 'a -> bool) (l: 'a list) : 'a list = begin match l with | [] -> [] | x :: xs -> let rest = filter pred xs in if pred x then x :: rest else rest end
Problem 3 introduces binary trees and some recursive functions that operate on trees. Problem 4 gives you practice with binary search trees. Although implementations of some of these functions are available in the lecture notes, you should be confident that you understand the code you are submitting.
Recall that a binary search tree is a binary tree that follows some additional invariants:
- `Empty` is a binary search tree, and - `Node (lt, v, rt)` is a binary search tree if both - `lt` is a binary search tree, and every value in `lt` is less than `v` - `rt` is a binary search tree, and every value in `rt` is greater than `v`
Notice that this description is recursive, just like our datatype definition! You may assume that all of the trees that are provided to the functions in this problem satisfy this invariant.
There’s no code to write for this part, but you should read through this
file in its entirety. This file defines a module signature, also known
as an interface, for the 'a set
abstract data type. The
word “abstract” means that we can define a set in terms of its behavior and
mathematical properties, rather than its concrete implementation—as we’ll see
later on, lists, binary search trees, and many other structures (even
functions!) can be used to represent sets.
You should familiarize yourself with the definitions and values in this module before moving on to setTest.ml. (Remember, understand the problem! We’ve written the interface for you.)
It might be helpful to keep this file open in separate window while you work on the rest of the assignment. Remember, do not modify this file.
This file introduces a reuseable module that can be used to test other
modules which conform to the SET
interface defined in
setInterface.ml. Because we will be implementing SET
in two
different ways, we can save some work by writing test cases against the
interface (since the two implementations have that in common).
You should make sure to thoroughly test all of the values defined in setInterface.ml. Your TAs will be manually grading the completeness of your test coverage in Problem 5. Finish writing your tests before moving on to the next file!
Problem 6 is the first concrete implementation of the SET
interface. It defines a module structure that conforms to
SET
, and so it must contain all of the functions defined in the
interface.
Inside this module, we tell the OCaml compiler that a 'a set
is
actually a 'a list
, and so they are equivalent for purposes of the
implementation. However, because the external interface doesn’t specify what a
'a set
actually is, the fact that it’s a list is not made
available to users outside the OLSet
module. (That’s why you had
to write test cases using only the SET
interface.)
In addition to just implementing the interface, you will be responsible two representation invariants about the lists in the function.
If you have a value of type 'a set
, you can assume it conforms
to these invariants. These
invariants make particular functions easier to implement, while some have to be
a bit more careful about ensuring that all the 'a set
s you create
conform to the invariants.
Part of your grade for this part will be based on how well you maintain and leverage the invariants in your implementation. We will be automatically testing this. Note that some ways of implementing the required functions, while technically correct, are not the most optimal implementations given your invariants. Think carefully about your inputs and outputs!
Problem 7 develops another implementation of the SET
interface, using binary search trees as the backing data
structure instead of lists. Remember to pay attention to the BST
invariants and maximize code reuse where possible.
This file demonstrates how to use set data structures to solve a practical problem -- how many SAT words show up in a given body of text?
There are 100 total points, broken down as follows:
As with Homework 2, we will be manually grading a portion of your homework. 5 points will go to Design - this includes utilizing previous functions and leveraging invariants in your implementation. 5 points will go to Coding Style - this includes following style conventions which can be found in the OCaml Style Guide. The final 5 points will go to testing. You will receive a maximum of 85 points when you submit.
For this assignment, you may submit without penalty up to 3 times. Each additional (on time) submission costs you 5 points.