Apology

• To: types
• Subject: Apology
• From: Jon Barwise (CS, Math, and Phil) <barwise@phil.indiana.edu>
• Date: Sat, 22 Feb 92 12:27:37 EST
• Sender: meyer@theory.lcs.mit.edu

To: linear@cs.stanford.edu
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 92 20:41:21 -0500

At least one person thinks it was a serious error of judgement to
circulate even anonymous comments without permission of the writer.
So clearly it was.  I apologize to anyone who feels this way.  I
clearly should have asked people for their permission first.  As a
poor excuse for poor jdugement, I take refuge in the press of so many
requests for me to share the responses.

My thought was that the divergent views expressed show that there is a
real need for someone to carry out a systematic survey and exposition
of the semantic ideas coming out of linear logic.  I hope that the
message will lead to more light, not heat, on linear logic and
relations to other parts of logic.  But, again, I do aplogize to
anyone who feels ill-used.  -Jon Barwise

• Prev: LINEAR LOGIC WORKSHOP
• Next: Re: Linear logic semantics (Barwise) (353 lines)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread